PRACTITIONER BLOG

Read our analyses of developments in Impact Litigation and stay current on class action law

Impact Fund & AMICI Urge Sixth Circuit to Affirm Class Certification in Discriminatory Water Billing Case
Class Action Cert, Amicus Brief Teddy Basham-Witherington Class Action Cert, Amicus Brief Teddy Basham-Witherington

Impact Fund & AMICI Urge Sixth Circuit to Affirm Class Certification in Discriminatory Water Billing Case

In October 2024, the Impact Fund and fellow amici Bet Tzedek Legal Services, Centro Legal de la Raza, Legal Aid at Work, and Public Counsel, filed a brief urging the Sixth Circuit to uphold the federal district court’s certification of a class of Black Cleveland residents who brought a lawsuit alleging discriminatory water billing practices by the City.   

Read More
Female High School Athletes Go the Distance in Title IX Settlement with Hawaii Department of Education
Title IX, Class Actions Teddy Basham-Witherington Title IX, Class Actions Teddy Basham-Witherington

Female High School Athletes Go the Distance in Title IX Settlement with Hawaii Department of Education

Female athletes at Campbell alleged widespread and systemic sex discrimination. Female athletes frequently had to use bathrooms in a nearby Burger King or hide underneath bleachers to change for practice. The girl’s water polo team would often have to practice in the ocean, facing winds and waves. Meanwhile, male athletes had access to their own locker room and appropriate athletic facilities. Moreover, when Campell’s female athletes reported disparate treatment to the school, they faced retaliation and threats to cancel the girls water polo season. Plaintiffs sought injunctive relief under Title IX. They alleged the Hawaii Department of Education and the Oahu Interscholastic Association failed to provide female athletes with equal athletic participation opportunities and equal athletic treatment and benefits. Plaintiffs also alleged the Department of Education retaliated against the class when student athletes reported gender discrimination.

Read More
RESPONDING TO THE RESTRICTION OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTIONS
Class Actions, Employment Discrimination Teddy Basham-Witherington Class Actions, Employment Discrimination Teddy Basham-Witherington

RESPONDING TO THE RESTRICTION OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTIONS

The arc of employment discrimination class action law is bending away from justice. As a result, plaintiffs’ lawyers frequently have to self-censor, generally in the opening complaint or the class certification motion, or as we did in Simpson at the 23(f) stage. Maximizing the chances for certification may require defining the class or multiple small classes so as to eliminate potential class members, claims, or forms of relief. Unfortunately, this type of self-censorship deprives employees of the possibility of obtaining the types of broad reforms that we were once able to achieve and hopefully can again pursue in the future as the law evolves.

Read More
Class Action Cert, Due Process Clause, HR 985 Teddy Basham-Witherington Class Action Cert, Due Process Clause, HR 985 Teddy Basham-Witherington

SCOTUS RULING AT ODDS WITH H.R. 985, WHICH WOULD PERMIT IMMEDIATE APPEALS OF ALL CLASS CERTIFICATION ORDERS

While the Microsoft case is a clear victory for corporate defendants, there is some language in the opinion that may be useful in another important fight in a different venue. H.R. 985, the anti-class action bill passed earlier this year by the House, would permit an interlocutory appeal from every class certification order. The high court’s opinion strongly endorsed a contrary perspective – it highlighted the wisdom of Rule 23(f)’s “careful calibration” of the question as well as the preference for determining such issues through rulemaking rather than legislation. Senate Judiciary Committee, are you listening? 

Read More
Class Action Certificate, Class Actions Teddy Basham-Witherington Class Action Certificate, Class Actions Teddy Basham-Witherington

Ninth Circuit: "Fortuitous Non-Injury" Does Not Defeat Class Certification

The recent appellate decision affirming class certification, Ruiz Torres v. Mercer Canyons Inc.No. 15-35615 (9th Cir. Aug. 31, 2016), written by Judge Milan Smith, skillfully addresses the issues of informational injury, non-injured class members, class definition, and aggregate damages while scrupulously declining defendant's invitation to engage the underlying merits. 

Read More
Rule 23, Class Actions Teddy Basham-Witherington Rule 23, Class Actions Teddy Basham-Witherington

Civil Rules Committee Takes On Serial Objectors with Proposed Rule 23 Changes

For 18 months, we have been tracking the work of the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, and specifically its Rule 23 subcommittee, which has been evaluating a range of proposals to amend the federal class action rule.  That work was recently completed and the Committee will soon set a schedule for public comment on a series of draft amendments.

The good news is that the Rule 23 proposals are modest and are not likely to trigger significant opposition like the firestorm that accompanied the discovery rule changes. 

Read More