data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c80df/c80df0b63b34061c9a8a7f281db8a8eb732ff636" alt=""
PRACTITIONER BLOG
Read our analyses of developments in Impact Litigation and stay current on class action law
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d364/7d364f163a6a081bbd6330d4b615d98eda16cb0e" alt="Impact Fund Amicus Brief Challenges "One-Size-Fits-All" Approach to Disparate Impact Discrimination"
Impact Fund Amicus Brief Challenges "One-Size-Fits-All" Approach to Disparate Impact Discrimination
California Department of Health Care Services’ steady decline in reimbursement rates to doctors for standard physician services through the state Medi-Cal program has driven doctors away from the program, denying low-income Californians meaningful access to necessary healthcare. The key to a disparate impact claim is the discriminatory impact resulting from a seemingly neutral policy. Our brief argues that the superior court adopted a dangerously narrow view of disparate impact.