data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c80df/c80df0b63b34061c9a8a7f281db8a8eb732ff636" alt=""
PRACTITIONER BLOG
Read our analyses of developments in Impact Litigation and stay current on class action law
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38a85/38a8561693eb5547cd6d46044ae016acc5482e61" alt="Ninth Circuit Finds That Discrimination Is A Concrete Injury For Purposes Of Article III Standing"
Ninth Circuit Finds That Discrimination Is A Concrete Injury For Purposes Of Article III Standing
The last few years have brought more and more standing-based challenges to our clients’ ability to have their day in court, with some success – look no further than TransUnion v. Ramirez, for example. Fortunately, the Ninth Circuit just rejected an attempt to insulate a bank from liability for admitted citizenship discrimination on standing grounds. Chattopadhyay v. BBVA is a class action alleging that BBVA (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria) discriminates on the basis of citizenship status in violation of 42 U.S.C. 1981 and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act.