PRACTITIONER BLOG

Read our analyses of developments in Impact Litigation and stay current on class action law

Impact Fund and NAACP Legal Defense Fund to SCOTUS: Don’t Rewrite Typicality
Class Action Typicality Teddy Basham-Witherington Class Action Typicality Teddy Basham-Witherington

Impact Fund and NAACP Legal Defense Fund to SCOTUS: Don’t Rewrite Typicality

The Impact Fund and NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of ourselves and twenty-four civil rights organizations. We argue that Ramirez indisputably satisfied typicality, as every class member in the case presented the same claims, were subject to the same conduct, and sought the same relief as Ramirez did. “TransUnion seeks to turn Rule 23 typicality on its head, asking the high court to rewrite the rule to protect defendants rather than absent class members,” declared Impact Fund’s Executive Director Jocelyn Larkin. “Nothing in the language or purpose of the rule supports TransUnion’s approach.”

Read More
California Supreme Court Ponders Digital Discrimination Case, White v. Square
Digital Discrimination, Unruh Act Teddy Basham-Witherington Digital Discrimination, Unruh Act Teddy Basham-Witherington

California Supreme Court Ponders Digital Discrimination Case, White v. Square

Along with Disability Rights Advocates and the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, the Impact Fund has written an amicus brief urging the California Supreme Court to recognize that turning users away through discriminatory terms of service or other actions is illegal discrimination, and that users who are deterred by discriminatory terms should be able to bring legal claims in court. 

Read More